Loading page content.
TopEmployer × claim type
Tribunal Watch has indexed 8 cases involving working time regulations claims against G&D Hairstyles Ltd, out of 8 total cases on record for this employer. See also all working time regulations cases across every employer.
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1801459/2023 | 18 August 2023 | England & Wales | Miss C Cooper | Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
| 1801460/2023 | 18 August 2023 | England & Wales | Miss A M Atkinson | Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
| 1801455/2023 | 3 August 2023 | England & Wales | Mrs A Eaton | Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £4,659 |
| 1801462/2023 | 3 August 2023 | England & Wales | Miss EJ Bradbury | Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £3,990 |
| 1801463/2023 | 3 August 2023 | England & Wales | Miss J Jones | Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £11,001 |
| 1801461/2023 | 3 August 2023 | England & Wales | Mrs H Davies | Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £9,298 |
| 1801457/2023 | 3 August 2023 | England & Wales | Miss M Andrews | Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £10,789 |
| 1801458/2023 | 3 August 2023 | England & Wales | Miss M Birks | Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £7,707 |
This page lists the subset of G&D Hairstyles Ltd's tribunal cases tagged with working time regulations in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.