Loading page content.
Employer file
Since 2017, Had considered their employment ongoing. 56. The application to amend is late in the proceedings with a hearing fixed for 9-12 May 2023. 57. The Tribunal have considerable doubts about the prospect of success of the unlawful deductions claims on the basis of the facts and circumstances relied upon. 4103802/2022 & 4103932/2022 Page 58. The Tribunal considers that there would be considerable prejudice to the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Breach of contract | 1 |
| 02 | Redundancy | 1 |
| 03 | Unfair dismissal | 1 |
| 04 | Working time regulations | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4103802/2022 | 13 April 2023 | Scotland | (sitting alone)5 Mr J Taylor | Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.