Loading page content.
TopEmployer × claim type
Tribunal Watch has indexed 7 cases involving unfair dismissal claims against Lunar Automotive Limited (in compulsory liquidation), out of 28 total cases on record for this employer. See also all unfair dismissal cases across every employer.
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2415758/2020 | 10 May 2022 | England & Wales | Mr D Mellor | Breach of contract, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £168,082 |
| 2419946/2020 | 1 April 2022 | England & Wales | Mr I Farquhar | Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £12,939 |
| 2418501/2020 | 9 December 2021 | England & Wales | Mr J Kilshaw | Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £3,682 |
| 2400550/2020 | 15 November 2021 | England & Wales | Mr Brian Mellor Mrs Susan Mellor | Breach of contract, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
| 2416830/2019 | 14 October 2021 | England & Wales | Mrs J Martynuik & Others (See attached Schedule) | Breach of contract, Other, Redundancy, Transfer of undertakings (TUPE), Unfair dismissal | — |
| 2420317/2020 | 8 October 2021 | England & Wales | Mr J Robinson | Breach of contract, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £7,036 |
| 2419619/2020 | 8 October 2021 | England & Wales | Mr G Hitchen | Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | £8,050 |
This page lists the subset of Lunar Automotive Limited (in compulsory liquidation)'s tribunal cases tagged with unfair dismissal in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.