Loading page content.
Employer file
Since 2017, Mr D Arundel Royal Mail Group Ltd has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Disability discrimination | 1 |
| 02 | Trade union | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1602180/2023 | 3 March 2025 | England & Wales | Respondent: Mr D Arundel Royal Mail Group Ltd JUDGMENT The claim of trade union detriment (s146 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992) is struck out. This does not affect the remaining claim of disability discrimination. REASONS 1. By a letter of 7 February 2025, the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing as to why the complaint of trade union detriment should not be struck out because it did not have a reasonable prospect of success. 2. The Claimant did not respond by the deadline of 21 February 2025 but his representative confirmed receipt of the strike out warning. As no representations have been made, the Tribunal proceeded to strike out this claim. _________________________________ Employment Judge Sharp Dated: 26 February 2025 ORDER SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 3 March 2025 Kacey O’Brien FOR THE SECRETARY TO EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS | Disability discrimination, Trade union | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.