Loading page content.
TopEmployer × claim type
Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving trade union claims against Mr D Arundel Royal Mail Group Ltd, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all trade union cases across every employer.
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1602180/2023 | 3 March 2025 | England & Wales | Respondent: Mr D Arundel Royal Mail Group Ltd JUDGMENT The claim of trade union detriment (s146 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992) is struck out. This does not affect the remaining claim of disability discrimination. REASONS 1. By a letter of 7 February 2025, the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing as to why the complaint of trade union detriment should not be struck out because it did not have a reasonable prospect of success. 2. The Claimant did not respond by the deadline of 21 February 2025 but his representative confirmed receipt of the strike out warning. As no representations have been made, the Tribunal proceeded to strike out this claim. _________________________________ Employment Judge Sharp Dated: 26 February 2025 ORDER SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 3 March 2025 Kacey O’Brien FOR THE SECRETARY TO EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS | Disability discrimination, Trade union | — |
This page lists the subset of Mr D Arundel Royal Mail Group Ltd's tribunal cases tagged with trade union in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.