Loading…

Working time regulations cases against Mr J.Tidy - Solicitor J U D G M E N T Upon the claimant having failed to attend; and Upon the claimant’s applications to postpone the Hearing having been refused on 21 & 22 March 2023 The — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch

Employer × claim type

Working time regulations cases against Mr J.Tidy - Solicitor J U D G M E N T Upon the claimant having failed to attend; and Upon the claimant’s applications to postpone the Hearing having been refused on 21 & 22 March 2023 The

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving working time regulations claims against Mr J.Tidy - Solicitor J U D G M E N T Upon the claimant having failed to attend; and Upon the claimant’s applications to postpone the Hearing having been refused on 21 & 22 March 2023 The, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all working time regulations cases across every employer.

Working time regulations cases: 1
Total awarded: —
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All working time regulations cases against Mr J.Tidy - Solicitor J U D G M E N T Upon the claimant having failed to attend; and Upon the claimant’s applications to postpone the Hearing having been refused on 21 & 22 March 2023 The

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
1305458/2022	23 March 2023	England & Wales	No Attendance For the	Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations, Other	—

Methodology

This page lists the subset of Mr J.Tidy - Solicitor J U D G M E N T Upon the claimant having failed to attend; and Upon the claimant’s applications to postpone the Hearing having been refused on 21 & 22 March 2023 The's tribunal cases tagged with working time regulations in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.