Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, Ms R Rodrigues DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Rules 68 – 71 Employment Tribunal Rules 2024) 1. I have seen an email dated 25 March 2025 from Mr Mustafa Ibrahim who is acting as the Claimant’s representative. The email was sent to me on 7 April 2025 and I have treated it as an application for reconsideration of the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Breach of contract | 1 | |
| 02 | Disability discrimination | 1 | |
| 03 | Whistleblowing | 1 | |
| 04 | Race discrimination | 1 | |
| 05 | Unfair dismissal | 1 | |
| 06 | Unlawful deduction from wages |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3203189/2022 | 25 March 2025 | England & Wales | Mr Laxman Akula | Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Whistleblowing, Race discrimination, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages, Working time regulations | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.
| 1 |
| 07 | Working time regulations | 1 |