Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, Objected to the amendment application. It was said by reference to the Selkent principles, that this was not a relabelling exercised, that the application was made out of time and that there would be prejudice to the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Breach of contract | 1 | |
| 02 | Disability discrimination | 1 | |
| 03 | Unfair dismissal | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4107095/2024 | 4 April 2025 | Scotland | Mrs M Ghouri | Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Unfair dismissal | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.