Case 4107095/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Ghouri v Claimed that she had been discriminated against because of disability, constructively dismissed and that the — 2025
- Case reference
- 4107095/2024
- Decision date
- 4 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Jones
Parties
12 namedMrs M Ghouri
- Claimed that she had been discriminated against because of disability, constructively dismissed and that the
- Was advised that her application to amend her claim to include a claim for breach of contract would be addressed at the preliminary hearing which had been listed to determine the question of disability status. Disability status was subsequently conceded by the
- ’s employment, with the
- Terminated by reason of her resignation on October 2024. Early conciliation commenced on August and a certificate was issued on September 2024.15 Application to amend 5. Parties clarified that the amendment sought was that the
- What contractual provision she was relying on, as her contract of employment stated under “Place of work”, that “You will normally be required to work at any of client sites as required by the needs of the business”. While the contract was signed by the
- ’s position, albeit confusing, appeared to be that she was willing to work shifts at Fort Kinnaird or Princes Street, but not able to work at the Gyle 4107095/2024 Page and that the
- ’s failure to offer shifts at that location was a breach of contract. 8. The
- Objected to the amendment application. It was said by reference to the Selkent principles, that this was not a relabelling exercised, that the application was made out of time and that there would be prejudice to the
Claims brought
3 categoriesOutcomes per claim are extracted in a second pass and are not yet published on this page.
Source document
Primary recordThe full judgment is available on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.