Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, Presented claims of unfair dismissal. They clearly considered their employment with the Responent to have ended. A claim of wrongful dismissal would have been consistent with the facts and circumstances upon which their original claims were based. 51. If they considered that their employment was continuing with the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Breach of contract | 1 | |
| 02 | Redundancy | 1 | |
| 03 | Unfair dismissal | 1 | |
| 04 | Working time regulations | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4103802/2022 | 13 April 2023 | Scotland | (sitting alone)5 Mr J Taylor | Breach of contract, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.