Loading…

’s own submisions he had researched the position online and put forward these claims himself. There was no good reason presented why he could not have done so in his original ET 1. It did appear to the tribunal that there was merit in the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Employer file

Employment tribunal cases against ’s own submisions he had researched the position online and put forward these claims himself. There was no good reason presented why he could not have done so in his original ET 1. It did appear to the tribunal that there was merit in the

Since 2017, ’s own submisions he had researched the position online and put forward these claims himself. There was no good reason presented why he could not have done so in his original ET 1. It did appear to the tribunal that there was merit in the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Unfair dismissal

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Unfair dismissal	1

All cases

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4110369/2021	15 March 2022	Scotland	(sitting alone) Mr I Major	Unfair dismissal	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.