Loading…

St Christophers School (Canterbury) Limited (in Liquidation) — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Employer file

Employment tribunal cases against St Christophers School (Canterbury) Limited (in Liquidation)

Since 2017, St Christophers School (Canterbury) Limited (in Liquidation) has appeared as a respondent in 8 employment tribunal cases, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Total cases: 8
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Breach of contract

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

5 distinct categories

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Breach of contract	8
02	Other	8
03	Redundancy	8
04	Unfair dismissal	8
05	Unlawful deduction from wages	8

All cases

8 cases · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
2303949/2018	20 August 2019	England & Wales	Mrs Julie Ongley	Breach of contract, Other, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
2303950/2018	20 August 2019	England & Wales	Mrs Sam Perry	Breach of contract, Other, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
2303951/2018	20 August 2019	England & Wales	Mrs Carol Poole	Breach of contract, Other, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
2303946/2018	20 August 2019	England & Wales	Mrs Jasmine Cracknell	Breach of contract, Other, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
2303947/2018	20 August 2019	England & Wales	Mrs Siobhan Gavriilidis	Breach of contract, Other, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
2303944/2018	20 August 2019	England & Wales	Miss Nicole Baker	Breach of contract, Other, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
2303948/2018	20 August 2019	England & Wales	Mrs Debra Wallace	Breach of contract, Other, Redundancy, Unfair dismissal, Unlawful deduction from wages	—
2303945/2018	20 August 2019

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.