Vol. I·6 May 2026

Search the index

Loading…

Loading page content.

Tribunal Watch

A structured, cross-cut index of UK employment tribunal decisions, built from the primary record at gov.uk/employment-tribunal-decisions. Independent of HMCTS and the Ministry of Justice.

Not legal advice. Information on this site is a matter of public record; it is not guidance on any individual case.

Editorial

About this site
Methodology
Corrections policy
Editorial standards

Rights & privacy

Open Government Licence v3.0
Privacy notice
Data subject requests
Atom feed (recent decisions)

Was looking at the roles not the people in the roles and determining whether the roles were sufficiently similar to merit a pooling exercise. This was a reasonable approach for the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Tribunal Watch/Employers/Was looking at the roles not the people in the roles and determining whether the roles were sufficiently similar to merit a pooling exercise. This was a reasonable approach for the

Employer file

Employment tribunal cases against Was looking at the roles not the people in the roles and determining whether the roles were sufficiently similar to merit a pooling exercise. This was a reasonable approach for the

Since 2017, Was looking at the roles not the people in the roles and determining whether the roles were sufficiently similar to merit a pooling exercise. This was a reasonable approach for the has appeared as a respondent in employment tribunal case.

, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Unfair dismissal

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Unfair dismissal	1

All cases

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
8000083/2023	5 July 2023	Scotland	Mr R Alexander, solicitor Judgment The	Unfair dismissal	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.