Was looking at the roles not the people in the roles and determining whether the roles were sufficiently similar to merit a pooling exercise. This was a reasonable approach for the

Since 2017, Was looking at the roles not the people in the roles and determining whether the roles were sufficiently similar to merit a pooling exercise. This was a reasonable approach for the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Indexed: 2 August 2026

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Unfair dismissal

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases	Relative share
01	Unfair dismissal	1

All cases

1 case · page 1 of 1 · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
8000083/2023	5 July 2023	Scotland	Mr R Alexander, solicitor Judgment The	Unfair dismissal	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.

Was looking at the roles not the people in the roles and determining whether the roles were sufficiently similar to merit a pooling exercise. This was a reasonable approach for the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch