Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, Was noted to have indicated that he no longer claimed unfair dismissal, but he did wish to claim holiday pay according to a schedule of loss, and the identity of the employer was disputed. That led to S/4112537/2018 Page the present Hearing to determine solely the issue of the identity of the employer. 2. The has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Unfair dismissal | 1 | |
| 02 | Working time regulations | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4112537/2018 | 19 February 2019 | Scotland | A Kemp (sitting alone) Mr J Brannan | Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.