Loading…

Was noted to have indicated that he no longer claimed unfair dismissal, but he did wish to claim holiday pay according to a schedule of loss, and the identity of the employer was disputed. That led to S/4112537/2018 Page the present Hearing to determine solely the issue of the identity of the employer. 2. The — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Employer file

Employment tribunal cases against Was noted to have indicated that he no longer claimed unfair dismissal, but he did wish to claim holiday pay according to a schedule of loss, and the identity of the employer was disputed. That led to S/4112537/2018 Page the present Hearing to determine solely the issue of the identity of the employer. 2. The

Since 2017, Was noted to have indicated that he no longer claimed unfair dismissal, but he did wish to claim holiday pay according to a schedule of loss, and the identity of the employer was disputed. That led to S/4112537/2018 Page the present Hearing to determine solely the issue of the identity of the employer. 2. The has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Unfair dismissal

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

2 distinct categories

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Unfair dismissal	1
02	Working time regulations	1

All cases

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4112537/2018	19 February 2019	Scotland	A Kemp (sitting alone) Mr J Brannan	Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.