Employer file
Since 2017, What he wanted to happen explaining that even if he persuaded me that one or more of the categories contained relevant documentation it would almost certainly mean delay and probably discharge of the hearing. I observed that the case had been ongoing for some time. I explained that it might be some months before new dates could be arranged. I suggested to him that he was able to give evidence of his own understanding of matters and if that wasn't challenged then that was evidence the tribunal could accept without the need for documentation. He would also have two witnesses from management one of whom was from HR giving evidence for the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Race discrimination | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8001901/2024 | 14 August 2026 | Scotland | Mr J Katkoria | Race discrimination | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.