Employer file

Would apply for that claim to be struck out on the basis of it having no prospects of success. I considered whether, taken at its highest, the claim in the proposed amendment seeking to rely on section of the ERA had, on the face of it (prima facia) prospects of success. I was conscious of the decision of the EAT in Woodhouse v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] WLUK 574. My consideration was not on the strength of the evidence in respect of the claims in the proposed amendment, but rather whether on the face of what is in the proposed amendment, the claims would be successful if proven. I accepted the

Since 2017, Would apply for that claim to be struck out on the basis of it having no prospects of success. I considered whether, taken at its highest, the claim in the proposed amendment seeking to rely on section of the ERA had, on the face of it (prima facia) prospects of success. I was conscious of the decision of the EAT in Woodhouse v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] WLUK 574. My consideration was not on the strength of the evidence in respect of the claims in the proposed amendment, but rather whether on the face of what is in the proposed amendment, the claims would be successful if proven. I accepted the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Indexed

2 August 2026