Loading…

Disability discrimination cases against Would apply for that claim to be struck out on the basis of it having no prospects of success. I considered whether, taken at its highest, the claim in the proposed amendment seeking to rely on section of the ERA had, on the face of it (prima facia) prospects of success. I was conscious of the decision of the EAT in Woodhouse v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] WLUK 574. My consideration was not on the strength of the evidence in respect of the claims in the proposed amendment, but rather whether on the face of what is in the proposed amendment, the claims would be successful if proven. I accepted the — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch

Employer × claim type

Disability discrimination cases against Would apply for that claim to be struck out on the basis of it having no prospects of success. I considered whether, taken at its highest, the claim in the proposed amendment seeking to rely on section of the ERA had, on the face of it (prima facia) prospects of success. I was conscious of the decision of the EAT in Woodhouse v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] WLUK 574. My consideration was not on the strength of the evidence in respect of the claims in the proposed amendment, but rather whether on the face of what is in the proposed amendment, the claims would be successful if proven. I accepted the

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving disability discrimination claims against Would apply for that claim to be struck out on the basis of it having no prospects of success. I considered whether, taken at its highest, the claim in the proposed amendment seeking to rely on section of the ERA had, on the face of it (prima facia) prospects of success. I was conscious of the decision of the EAT in Woodhouse v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] WLUK 574. My consideration was not on the strength of the evidence in respect of the claims in the proposed amendment, but rather whether on the face of what is in the proposed amendment, the claims would be successful if proven. I accepted the, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all disability discrimination cases across every employer.

Disability discrimination cases: 1
Total awarded: —
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All disability discrimination cases against Would apply for that claim to be struck out on the basis of it having no prospects of success. I considered whether, taken at its highest, the claim in the proposed amendment seeking to rely on section of the ERA had, on the face of it (prima facia) prospects of success. I was conscious of the decision of the EAT in Woodhouse v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] WLUK 574. My consideration was not on the strength of the evidence in respect of the claims in the proposed amendment, but rather whether on the face of what is in the proposed amendment, the claims would be successful if proven. I accepted the

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4110004/2021	14 June 2022	Scotland	Mrs Natalie Ann Wright	Disability discrimination	—

Methodology

This page lists the subset of Would apply for that claim to be struck out on the basis of it having no prospects of success. I considered whether, taken at its highest, the claim in the proposed amendment seeking to rely on section of the ERA had, on the face of it (prima facia) prospects of success. I was conscious of the decision of the EAT in Woodhouse v Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust [2012] WLUK 574. My consideration was not on the strength of the evidence in respect of the claims in the proposed amendment, but rather whether on the face of what is in the proposed amendment, the claims would be successful if proven. I accepted the's tribunal cases tagged with disability discrimination in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.