Case 1302121/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person (assisted by McKenzie Friends) For the v Mr R. Chaudhry — 2023
- Case reference
- 1302121/2022
- Decision date
- 8 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Perry
- Panel members
- Mrs R Pelter, Mr J Sharma
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person (assisted by McKenzie Friends) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe final merits hearing took place in Birmingham before Employment Judge Perry, with Mrs R Pelter and Mr J Sharma sitting as lay members. The tribunal held that the respondent did not contravene Part 5 of the Equality Act 2010 and dismissed the claimant’s complaints that he had been harassed, directly discriminated against, and victimised.
The written record does not set out separate written reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing, and it states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No findings are recorded in the text on liability beyond the dismissal of the Equality Act complaints.
On costs, the parties agreed that the claimant would pay £250 to the respondent. The judgment records that agreement as the only monetary figure in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment records a complaint of harassment under Part 5 Equality Act 2010. The body of the judgment does not restate the protected characteristic, but the case listing identifies the case as race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records a complaint that the claimant was directly discriminated against in breach of Part 5 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records a complaint of victimisation in breach of Part 5 Equality Act 2010. The body of the judgment does not restate the protected characteristic, but the case listing identifies the case as race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.