Case 1303111/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Crooks v Wolverhampton Homes — 2023
- Case reference
- 1303111/2022
- Decision date
- 17 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Woffenden Members
- Venue
- Midlands West
- Panel members
- Mrs B Astill, Mr H Howard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Crooks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Ms C Crooks's claims against Wolverhampton Homes Limited at Midlands West over 30 and 31 October and 1, 2 and 3 November 2023, with the final decision recorded on 17 November 2023. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's Equality Act 2010 claim under sections 20 and 21, which was a disability discrimination claim based on alleged failures in relation to reasonable adjustments. It also dismissed the claimant's section 26 Equality Act 2010 claim, which was the separate harassment claim.
The tribunal further dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. No compensatory, basic award, injury to feelings, or interest figures are recorded in the written judgment, and no monetary award was made on the face of the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010; dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Claim under section 26 Equality Act 2010; dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.