Case 1305754/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hussain v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 1305754/2023
- Decision date
- 11 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Dr G Hammersley, Mrs D Rance
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hussain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Hussain brought complaints of race discrimination and harassment related to race against Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council. The case was heard at Birmingham on 9, 10 and 11 December 2024 before Employment Judge Kenward, sitting with Dr G Hammersley and Mrs D Rance, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by counsel.
The tribunal found that the claimant's race discrimination complaints were not well-founded and dismissed them. It also found that the complaints of harassment related to race were not well-founded and dismissed them. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held the claimant's complaints of race discrimination were not well-founded and dismissed them. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal held the claimant's complaints of harassment related to race were not well-founded and dismissed them. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.