Case 1305964/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Blake-Mills v G4S Care & Justice Services (UK) Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 1305964/2024
- Decision date
- 15 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Akhtar
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Blake-Mills
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent applied for reconsideration of the judgment sent to the parties on 10 December 2025. The application challenged the tribunal's finding that asking the claimant "Are you a drug dealer?" was an act of harassment related to race, arguing error of law in the burden of proof under section 136 of the Equality Act 2010 and perversity in light of negative findings on two other harassment allegations.
Employment Judge Akhtar refused the application after preliminary consideration. The judge did not accept that there had been an error of law and stated that, if the respondent contended there was one, the proper route was appeal rather than reconsideration. The judge also found that the respondent's second ground sought to reopen factual issues already determined and did not identify something important missed by the tribunal or new evidence that could not reasonably have been put forward at the hearing.
The tribunal concluded there was no reasonable prospect of the original decision being varied or revoked. No remedy figures or lay panel members are stated in this reconsideration judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | This is a reconsideration judgment. It records that the original judgment found one act of harassment related to race, while two of three harassment allegations had negative findings. The reconsideration application was refused and the original decision was not varied or revoked. | Upheld | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- rule 69 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 70(2) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 2 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- section 136 of the Equality Act 2010
- Ministry of Justice v Burton and anor [2016] EWCA Civ 714
- Flint v Eastern Electricity Board [1975] ICR 395
- Lindsay v Ironsides Ray and Vials [1994] ICR 384
- Liddington v 2Gether NHS Foundation Trust EAT/0002/16
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.