Case 1306537/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms B Respondent 1: Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Respondent 2: NHS England Respondent 3: No longer a party to the proceedings Respondent 4: Birmingham City Council (Claims against this Respondent had settled). v The Claimant’s claims for breaches of s39, 40, and 55 Equality Act 2010 are not well founded because: 1.1. The Claimant’s allegations of direct disability Discrimination in breach of s13 Equality Act 2010 are not well founded; 1.2. The Claimant’s allegations of discrimination because of something arising in consequence of her disabilities in breach of s15 Equality Act 2010 are not well founded; 1.3. The Claimant’s allegations that the Respondents failed to make reasonable adjustments in breach of s20 and 21 Equality Act 2010 are not well founded; 1.4. The Claimant’s allegations that the Respondents subjected the Claimant to harassment in breach of s26 Equality Act 2010 are not well founded; 1.5. The Claimant’s allegations that the Respondents victimised the Claimant in breach of s27 Equality Act 2010 are not well founded; Consequently, all discrimination allegations against both Respondents fail and are dismissed. — 2024
- Case reference
- 1306537/2020
- Decision date
- 28 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge G Smart
Parties
4 namedMs B Respondent 1: Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Respondent 2: NHS England Respondent 3: No longer a party to the proceedings Respondent 4: Birmingham City Council (Claims against this Respondent had settled).