Case 1306836/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs K Kaur v Star Academies and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1306836/2020
- Decision date
- 7 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Meichen
- Venue
- Birmingham
- Panel members
- Mr E Stanley, Mrs N Chavda
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs K Kaur
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Birmingham on 7, 8, 9, 10 and 13 to 17 June 2022, before Employment Judge Meichen sitting with Mr E Stanley and Mrs N Chavda, the tribunal dismissed the claimant's complaints of unfair dismissal, detriment for making a protected disclosure, direct race/religion discrimination, and harassment. The judgment records that all of those claims failed and were dismissed.
The judgment is a short liability decision and does not set out the tribunal's detailed findings, legal reasoning, or any remedy calculation. Because every claim was dismissed, no monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes this as detriment for making a protected disclosure. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | The judgment does not specify which protected characteristic the harassment complaint related to. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.