Case 1309547/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Jarrett v Cambian Childcare Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1309547/2020
- Decision date
- 27 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Jones
- Panel members
- Mr K Palmer, Mrs H Astill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Jarrett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Birmingham via video on 22-26 May and 27 June 2023 before Employment Judge J Jones, sitting with Mr K Palmer and Mrs H Astill. Miss S Jarrett brought claims against Cambian Childcare Limited arising from race discrimination, harassment because of race, age discrimination, and unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract.
The tribunal’s judgment records that all of those claims failed and were dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment describes this as harassment because of race and dismisses it together with the other claims. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment disposes of unlawful deduction from wages together with breach of contract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment disposes of breach of contract together with unlawful deduction from wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.