Case 1402838/2021 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v 5 Solutions Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1402838/2021
- Decision date
- 29 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gray Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not attend and was not represented, and no response had been submitted, so R21 applied. Employment Judge Gray gave judgment at a video hearing in Southampton on 23 September 2022.
The tribunal held that the claimant's complaints for accrued but unpaid holiday pay of five days, unpaid expenses, unpaid wages and pension contributions for 1 May 2021 to 25 May 2021, and sexual harassment succeeded. The tribunal awarded the specified sums for holiday pay, expenses, wages, pension contributions, and discrimination compensation.
The discrimination compensation comprised injury to feelings, net loss of earnings for 26 May 2021 to 21 July 2021, and interest calculated at 8% on those sums. The written judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as accrued but unpaid holiday pay of five days. | Upheld | — | £519 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment awards unpaid expenses; the precise legal label is not expanded beyond the complaint wording. | Upheld | — | £253 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment awards unpaid wages of £1,817.31 gross and pension contributions of £54.52 for 1 May 2021 to 25 May 2021. | Upheld | — | £1,872 |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the complaint for sexual harassment succeeded and awards compensation for discrimination. | Upheld | Sex | £34,235 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £36,879
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,840
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.