Case 1403831/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Antoinette McIntosh v Asda Stores Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1403831/2021
- Decision date
- 22 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Dated
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms S Maidment, Ms D England
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Antoinette McIntosh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the case at Bristol from 20 to 22 March 2023 before Employment Judge C H O'Rourke, sitting with Ms S Maidment and Ms D England. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, direct discrimination, and harassment on grounds of race failed and were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not set out further findings or reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment identifies direct discrimination on grounds of race and states that it failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment identifies harassment on grounds of race and states that it failed and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.