Case 1404372/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Giovann Battista Lo Bianco v South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 1404372/2021
- Decision date
- 8 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M. Salter Representation
- Venue
- Exeter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Giovann Battista Lo Bianco
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant complained that work colleagues subjected him to treatment including mocking his Italian accent and making comments about his nationality. The complaints identified in the judgment were direct discrimination and harassment, both related to race and of a sexual nature. It was accepted that all complaints had been presented outside the primary statutory time limit, with the last alleged act on 9 March 2021 and the claim form presented on 12 November 2021.
The tribunal considered the just and equitable extension under section 123 of the Equality Act 2010. It found that the delay was significant, that the claimant knew the relevant facts and was aware of the Equality Act by April 2021, and that he had access to legal and union advice. It also noted the claimant's ill health in the second quarter of 2021, his decision to pursue the internal grievance process, and that he acted within three days of receiving the ACAS certificate from his union.
The tribunal concluded that the issue was finely balanced, but the balance of prejudice favoured the claimant. The respondent had not identified particular evidential or other prejudice beyond the cost and burden of defending the claim, and the grievance had put it on notice of the allegations. The tribunal held that the claim had been presented within such period as it considered just and equitable; it did not determine the merits of the discrimination or harassment complaints.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal decided only the limitation issue, holding that the Equality Act claim was presented within such period as it considered just and equitable. The merits of the direct race discrimination complaint were not determined in this judgment. | Other | Race | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal decided only the limitation issue. The merits of the race-related harassment complaint were not determined in this judgment. | Other | Race | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal recorded a complaint of harassment of a sexual nature but decided only the limitation issue. The merits were not determined in this judgment. | Other | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- s.33 Limitation Act 1980
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble
- Abertawe Bro Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan
- Miller v MoJ
- Pathan v South London Islamic Centre
- Southwark London Borough Council v Afolabi
- Lupetti v Wrens Old House Ltd
- Ahmed v Ministry of Justice
- Apelogun-Gabriels v Lambeth London Borough Council
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.