Case 1404629/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Pastrama v Somerset Passenger Solutions Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1404629/2019
- Decision date
- 21 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Date
- Venue
- Bristol
- Panel members
- Ms Y Ramsaran, Ms E Smillie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Pastrama
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Bristol, sitting on 12 to 15 July 2021, Employment Judge C H O’Rourke sat with Ms Y Ramsaran and Ms E Smillie. The written judgment records that Mr G Pastrama’s claims of detriment in respect of protected disclosure, breach of the Working Time Regulations, direct race discrimination, race harassment, and arrears of holiday pay all failed and were dismissed.
The extracted text does not set out written reasons, stating only that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. The only monetary figure recorded in the judgment is a costs order requiring the claimant to pay the respondent £16,800.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £16,800
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.