Case 1600429/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Rhiannon Morris v Pobl Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600429/2024
- Decision date
- 28 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Prof J Ukemenam, Mr M Vine
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Rhiannon Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought complaints of unfair dismissal, discrimination arising from disability, and harassment related to disability against Pobl Group Limited. The hearing took place at Cardiff on 21, 22, 23 and 24 October 2024 before Employment Judge S Jenkins, Prof J Ukemenam and Mr M Vine.
The judgment records that all three complaints failed and were dismissed. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would only be provided if requested within the specified time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint failed and was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in the text. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment identifies this as discrimination arising from disability and states that it failed and was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in the text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment identifies this as harassment related to disability and states that it failed and was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in the text. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.