Case 1600714/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr S Bridges v Asda Stores Limited — 2023

Case reference: 1600714/2022
Decision date: 3 May 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge S Moore
Panel members: Mrs B Currie, Mr A McLean

Indexed: 18 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr S Bridges

Respondent

Asda Stores Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal found that the claimant was a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.

The claimant's claim for (constructive) unfair dismissal succeeded. The claims for direct disability discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, and disability related harassment also succeeded.

The claims for failure to make reasonable adjustments and victimisation failed and were dismissed. The judgment records that a remedy hearing would be listed, and no remedy figures are given in this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

6 findings recorded

This case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Constructive dismissal	The judgment describes this as the claimant's claim for '(constructive) unfair dismissal' succeeding.	Upheld	—	—
Disability discrimination	Direct disability discrimination succeeded.	Upheld	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Discrimination arising from disability succeeded.	Upheld	Disability	—
Harassment	Disability related harassment succeeded.	Upheld	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Failure to make reasonable adjustments failed and was dismissed.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Victimisation	Victimisation failed and was dismissed. The judgment does not separately specify the protected act or characteristic for this claim; disability is inferred from the case context and other discrimination claims.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.