Case 1601128/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Price v G4S Care & Justice Services (UK) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1601128/2019
- Decision date
- 7 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Price
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The tribunal recorded that Mr N Price withdrew the complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments, indirect discrimination, harassment and victimisation, and those complaints were dismissed following that withdrawal.
The judgment did not determine the merits of those withdrawn complaints and recorded no remedy or monetary award. It stated that the claimant's remaining claim or claims would proceed to hearing on 11 November 2019.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments complaint dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Indirect discrimination complaint dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; the judgment does not separately spell out the protected characteristic, but the reasonable adjustments complaint identifies the disability discrimination context. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Harassment complaint dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; the judgment does not identify a protected characteristic for this complaint. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Victimisation | Victimisation complaint dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.