Mrs M Ken v Asda Stores Limited — 2019

Case reference: 1601589/2018
Decision date: 27 April 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge A Frazer Representation
Venue: Cardiff

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mrs M Ken

Respondent

Asda Stores Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims of direct discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunal's Rules of Procedure. The judgment does not identify the protected characteristic or characteristics attached to those discrimination claims.

The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's application to amend was unsuccessful. Following that unsuccessful amendment application, the harassment claim was dismissed. No remedy was awarded or assessed in the judgment.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment states that the claims of direct discrimination were dismissed upon withdrawal under Rule 52, but does not identify the protected characteristic or characteristics.	Withdrawn	—	—
Harassment	The harassment claim was dismissed after the claimant's application to amend was unsuccessful; the judgment does not identify a protected characteristic for this claim.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.