Case 1805462/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M McGrattan v Resq — 2023
- Case reference
- 1805462/2022
- Decision date
- 13 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M McGrattan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the Claimant's claim after he failed to comply with orders made on 21 December 2022 and 6 February 2023. The Respondent had sought further information on 14 December 2022 about complaints of harassment, an allegation of assault, and a complaint of constructive dismissal. At a preliminary hearing on 21 December 2022, Employment Judge Brain ordered the Claimant to provide a response by 20 January 2023.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harassment | The judgment refers to complaints of harassment but does not specify any protected characteristic or determine the complaint on the merits. The claim was struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal orders. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to an allegation of assault. Assault is not a specific claim type in the extraction taxonomy, so it is recorded as other. The claim was struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal orders. | Struck out | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment expressly refers to a complaint of constructive dismissal. It was not determined on the merits; the claim was struck out for failure to comply with Tribunal orders. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.