Case 2200293/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Glazebrook v Asos.com Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2200293/2020
- Decision date
- 21 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Norris Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Glazebrook
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held an open preliminary hearing on 6 October 2020 before Employment Judge Russell, sitting alone, with the claimant absent. The respondent applied to strike out the claims on the basis of a settlement agreement, limitation, and employment status.
The tribunal found that the claimant had voluntarily entered into a settlement agreement on 7 February 2020 and that it complied with the statutory requirements for a valid compromise under section 203 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and the Equality Act 2010. The agreement listed the claimant's pleaded complaints in Schedule 2, and the respondent paid £16,100 on 14 February 2020 in performance of the agreement.
The judge rejected the claimant's assertions of mental incapacity and economic duress. The tribunal relied on the contemporaneous emails in which the claimant confirmed that he was not under duress and was of sound mind, together with the evidence that he had legal advice on the agreement. The tribunal also noted that the claims were out of time, although it did not finally determine the limitation and status points because the settlement agreement was sufficient to dispose of the case.
All pleaded complaints, including unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, harassment, breach of contract, unauthorised deduction from wages, other contractual payments, and working time claims, were struck out under Rule 37(1)(a) because the tribunal found they had no reasonable prospect of success once the settlement agreement point was accepted.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Harassment | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment refers to this head of claim as 'other contractual payments'. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
9 references- Rule 37(1)(a) ET Rules 2013
- s.203 ERA 1996
- s.111(2)(a) ERA 1996
- s.111(2)(b) ERA 1996
- s.207 ERA 1996
- Mental Capacity Act 2005 ss.1(2), 2 and 3
- economic duress
- Glasgow City Council v Dahhan
- Hennessy v Craigmyle and Co Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.