Case 2300374/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. A. Fazzari Di Pietrantonio v Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300374/2022
- Decision date
- 9 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sudra Sitting
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mrs. L. Lindsay, Ms. N. O’Hare
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. A. Fazzari Di Pietrantonio
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting unanimously, upheld the claimant’s direct sex discrimination complaints in relation to allegations 1.1.3 and 1.1.4. It dismissed the claimant’s direct sex discrimination complaints in relation to allegations 1.1.1 and 1.1.2, as well as the indirect sex discrimination complaint and the harassment related to sex complaint.
As remedy, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant an injury to feelings award of £9,100.00 and a financial loss award of £3,277.50, together with interest of £1,577.57 on the injury to feelings award and £103.70 on the financial loss award, giving a total of £14,058.77.
The tribunal also made recommendations. It directed the respondent to write to the claimant after reviewing any continuing restrictions for working in the Trust and, if those restrictions were to continue, to explain why and provide a right of appeal. It further directed the respondent to correct its records to remove references to the claimant 'having a bad attitude and walking off site and leaving patients vulnerable.'
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination complaints in allegations 1.1.3 and 1.1.4 were upheld. The judgment gives a single remedy figure for the upheld sex discrimination findings rather than splitting compensation by allegation. | Upheld | Sex | £14,059 |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination complaints in allegations 1.1.1 and 1.1.2, and the indirect sex discrimination complaint, were dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The harassment related to sex complaint was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £14,059
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £3,278
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.