Case 2300437/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Juan Carlos Medina Invernol v Nuffield Health — 2024
- Case reference
- 2300437/2023
- Decision date
- 12 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Croydon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Juan Carlos Medina Invernol
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the Croydon CVP hearing on 11 July 2024, Employment Judge Liz Ord heard the respondent's strike-out applications. The tribunal granted the application in relation to paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5, 13 and 14 of the claimant's Scott schedule, finding that those allegations had no reasonable prospect of success.
The tribunal dismissed the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's direct discrimination claims that were also pursued as harassment claims. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The respondent's application to strike out paragraphs 2, 3, 4, 5, 13 and 14 of the claimant's Scott schedule was granted on the basis that those allegations had no reasonable prospect of success. | Other | Race | — |
| Harassment | The respondent's application to strike out the claimant's direct discrimination claims that were also pursued as harassment claims was dismissed. | Other | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.