Case 2300803/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms P Olorunnibe v Lidl Great Britain Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2300803/2020
- Decision date
- 7 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Barker
- Panel members
- Ms F Whiting, Ms N Beeston
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms P Olorunnibe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent from 9 September 2019 until dismissal on 8 October 2019 during her probationary period. She brought claims of direct race discrimination and racial harassment, relying on her Black African race and Nigerian national origins. The tribunal also refused her application to strike out the response, finding that further disclosure was not necessary or proportionate and that a fair hearing remained possible.
On direct discrimination, the tribunal accepted that some matters occurred, including the claimant being denied time to read guidance notes, close monitoring, dismissal before the end of probation, and being escorted from the premises. It found, however, that the treatment was explained by the claimant's performance, the fast-paced working environment, and the respondent's management approach, not by race or national origins. Other allegations, including deliberate sabotage through invoices, small fonts, and inciting poor training, were not made out.
On harassment, the tribunal accepted that the claimant perceived a number of interactions as unwanted and that she found the workplace stressful and difficult. It found that the relevant conduct did not relate to race or national origins, and in some instances that it was not reasonable for it to have the statutory effect. The tribunal concluded that none of the claimant's claims were made out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The claimant described her race as Black African and also relied on Nigerian national origins during evidence. The tribunal considered the allegations as race/national origins direct discrimination under s13 Equality Act 2010 and found they were not made out. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The harassment allegations were advanced as harassment on grounds of race under s26 Equality Act 2010, including matters relating to national origins. The tribunal found the alleged conduct either was not made out, was not related to race, or did not reasonably have the statutory effect. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s13 Equality Act 2010
- s26 Equality Act 2010
- Pemberton v Inwood [2018] EWCA Civ 564
- Land Registry v Grant [2011] EWCA Civ 769
- s23(1) Equality Act 2010
- s136 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.