Case 2301018/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Raza Second v STM Group (UK) Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2301018/2022
- Decision date
- 9 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rahman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Raza Second
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that both parties agreed STM Group was not the correct respondent. The claimant was given an opportunity to make representations in writing before the preliminary hearing and again at the hearing on 9 October 2023, and he agreed that the claims should continue against the correct respondent.
As against STM Group, the Tribunal struck out the complaints of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 Equality Act 2010, failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21, harassment under section 26, victimisation under section 27, and the associated claim for compensation for injury to feelings. The stated basis was that STM Group was not the correct respondent and the claims had not been actively pursued against it.
The judgment records that the remaining claims were still listed for hearing against the first respondent on 3 to 7 June 2024. No monetary award was made against STM Group in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Section 15 Equality Act 2010 complaint struck out as against STM Group because it was not the correct respondent and the claimant agreed the claims should continue against the correct respondent. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Other | Failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20/21 Equality Act 2010 struck out as against STM Group for the same reason. | Struck out | — | — |
| Harassment | Section 26 Equality Act 2010 complaint struck out as against STM Group because it was not the correct respondent and the claim was not actively pursued against it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Victimisation | Section 27 Equality Act 2010 complaint struck out as against STM Group for the same reason. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.