Case 2301729/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Vigilant Security (Scotland) Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301729/2022
- Decision date
- 31 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge O’Rourke Dated
- Panel members
- Ms E Thompson, Miss N Murphy
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London South by video on 16 to 19 December 2024, Employment Judge C H O’Rourke sat with Ms E Thompson and Miss N Murphy. The written judgment records that the claimant’s claims of direct sex discrimination, age and sex-related harassment, victimisation, and discrimination arising from disability failed.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the claims in full. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days; no monetary award or other remedy is recorded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Harassment | The judgment refers to age and sex-related harassment and does not separate the characteristics in the extract. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Victimisation | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Recorded in the judgment as discrimination arising from disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.