Case 2301847/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. Y Rose v London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 2301847/2022
- Decision date
- 12 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge D. Wright Tribunal
- Venue
- London South via CVP
- Panel members
- E. Whitlam, W. Dixon
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms. Y Rose
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's direct sex discrimination, direct race discrimination, harassment related to race and sex, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and breach of contract claims. The supplied text states those claims were without merit, but the middle of the judgment is truncated in the prompt, so the detailed reasoning for each dismissed discrimination and contract claim is not fully visible.
The tribunal upheld the unfair constructive dismissal claim on a limited basis. It found that most alleged breaches did not amount to breaches of the implied term of trust and confidence, but that the grievance outcome was reached by an unfair and flawed process after the grievance was taken out of the formal process. The tribunal found that this breach caused the claimant to lose trust in the respondents and that she resigned because trust and confidence had broken down, rather than because she had found other work.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment described this as an unfair constructive dismissal claim and upheld it on the basis of the grievance policy/process. | Upheld | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the direct sex discrimination claim was without merit and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the direct race discrimination claim was without merit and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that harassment on grounds of race was without merit and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that harassment on grounds of sex was without merit and dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the failure to make reasonable adjustments claim was without merit and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the breach of contract claim was without merit and dismissed. |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 123 of the Equality Act 2010
- section 6 of the Equality Act 2010
- implied term of trust and confidence
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.