Case 2301944/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Brendan St Catherine v Lidl Great Britain Limited and 2 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 2301944/2024
- Decision date
- 24 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Dated
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Brendan St Catherine
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claims against the second and third respondents were dismissed on withdrawal. It also recorded that the direct discrimination claims on the grounds of sex and race were dismissed on withdrawal.
The judgment states that the claims against the first respondent for discrimination arising from disability under Equality Act 2010 section 15 and failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20/21 will proceed. It further states that the claimant is not pursuing direct disability discrimination, harassment or victimisation claims.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of direct discrimination on the grounds of sex was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the claim of direct discrimination on the grounds of race was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claims against the first respondent of discrimination arising from disability under Equality Act 2010 section 15 and failure to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20/21 will proceed. | Other | Disability | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the claimant is not pursuing harassment claims, but does not separately set out a dismissal order for this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the claimant is not pursuing victimisation claims, but does not separately set out a dismissal order for this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Equality Act 2010 section 15
- Equality Act 2010 sections 20/21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.