Case 2302055/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Liu v University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust and 2 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 2302055/2023
- Decision date
- 15 October 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge HART Date
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mr Liu
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records a partial withdrawal under rule 52. The complaints of direct discrimination because of religion, harassment related to religion, and unlawful deduction of wages were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant.
The judgment also states that all other complaints brought by the claimant would proceed to the next hearing on 15 October 2024. It does not determine the merits of those continuing complaints or record any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of direct discrimination because of religion is dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the complaint of harassment related to religion is dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Religion or belief | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the complaint of unlawful deduction of wages is dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.