Case 2302158/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Ul-Haq v Transport UK London Bus Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 2302158/2023
- Decision date
- 14 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Abbott
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Ms J Cook, Ms C Edwards
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Ul-Haq
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt London South Employment Tribunal in Croydon, Employment Judge Abbott sat with Ms J Cook and Ms C Edwards on 10-14 November 2025. Mr I Ul-Haq represented himself, and Transport UK London Bus Limited was represented by counsel instructed by Backhouse Jones Solicitors. The judgment was approved on 14 November 2025.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded and dismissed it. It also held that the complaint of wrongful dismissal, framed as breach of contract in respect of notice pay, was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The tribunal further held that the complaints of direct discrimination because of race, age and/or religion/belief were not well-founded and dismissed them, and it dismissed the complaints of harassment related to race, age and/or religion/belief. No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The wrongful dismissal complaint was described as breach of contract in respect of notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The tribunal grouped the direct discrimination complaints as because of race, age and/or religion/belief. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Age discrimination | The tribunal grouped the direct discrimination complaints as because of race, age and/or religion/belief. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The tribunal grouped the direct discrimination complaints as because of race, age and/or religion/belief. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | The tribunal grouped the harassment complaints as related to race, age and/or religion/belief. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.