Case 2302772/2016 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S McLeary v One Housing Group Limited — 2017
- Case reference
- 2302772/2016
- Decision date
- 23 November 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Baron Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S McLeary
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs McLeary brought Equality Act 2010 claims relying on disability, namely dyslexia. The respondent accepted that she was disabled, but the claims were denied. The preliminary hearing was concerned with whether the Equality Act claims were in time.
The tribunal identified the complaints as including section 15 allegations of unfavourable treatment because of something arising from disability, harassment, victimisation, and a failure to make reasonable adjustments. It found that the complaints were out of time: the earliest factual allegations dated back to March 2015, and the claimant did not contact ACAS under early conciliation until 20 September 2016, after her employment had ended on 30 June 2016.
The claimant relied on illness, being let down by her union, and hoping the grievance process would resolve matters, but the tribunal said those explanations lacked detail and did not justify extending time. Applying the just and equitable test and the guidance in British Coal Corporation v Keeble, it treated the length of the delay, the claimant's promptness after the grievance appeal outcome letter of 28 June 2016, and prejudice to the respondent as important factors. It noted that three important witnesses had left the respondent's employment.
The tribunal dismissed the Equality Act claims and said the judgment did not affect the constructive unfair dismissal claim arising from the claimant's resignation on 30 June 2016.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed at a preliminary hearing as out of time. The allegations described under this head were the section 15 complaints about unfavourable treatment because of something arising from disability and the failure to make reasonable adjustments allegation, and the tribunal did not reach the merits. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Harassment | Dismissed as out of time. The tribunal treated allegations 4 to 18 as harassment claims, including complaints about rota/hours, appraisals, monitoring, workload, phone/email access, grievance matters, sickness absence procedure and HR communications. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Dismissed as out of time. The tribunal dealt with allegations 19 and 20 as victimisation claims and did not decide the underlying factual merits. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- just and equitable extension of time
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble [1997] IRLR 336 EAT
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre [2003] IRLR 434 CA
- Edomobi v La Retraite RC Girls School UKEAT/0180/16
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.