Case 2303133/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Riley v Achieving for Children and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 2303133/2023
- Decision date
- 21 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans Representation
- Venue
- London South
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss M Riley
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss M Riley’s unfair dismissal claim against Achieving for Children and YMCA St Paul’s Group was dismissed. The tribunal’s reason was that she had not been dismissed within the meaning of section 95 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and it stated that a person who has not been dismissed cannot bring an unfair dismissal complaint.
The judgment records that the case was heard at London South Employment Tribunal on 19-20 May 2025 before Employment Judge Evans, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondents represented by counsel. No remedy was awarded because the claim failed at the threshold stage on dismissal status.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was not dismissed within the meaning of section 95 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, so the unfair dismissal complaint could not proceed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 95 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.