Case 2303233/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Olatunde v CIS Security Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2303233/2018
- Decision date
- 14 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tsamados
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mr E Walker, Mrs F Whiting
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Olatunde
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal at London South, sitting on 12 to 14 October 2020 before Employment Judge Tsamados with Mr E Walker and Mrs F Whiting, gave a unanimous judgment in this case brought by Mr S Olatunde against CIS Security Ltd. The tribunal recorded that the Claimant's complaints of race discrimination and harassment were unfounded.
The judgment gives no written reasons beyond that short record, and states that the claim was therefore dismissed. No remedy was awarded or recorded in the written decision. Because the written record contains no factual findings beyond the dismissal, no further reasoning can be extracted from the judgment text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment states that the Claimant's complaints of race discrimination were unfounded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment states that the Claimant's complaints of harassment were unfounded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.