Case 2305156/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Abdeljalil Drahmane v E.ON Energy Solutions Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2305156/2021
- Decision date
- 14 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Fowell
- Panel members
- Ms H Bharadia, Mrs S Laurence-Doig
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Abdeljalil Drahmane
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Croydon in a hybrid hearing on 6 to 14 November 2023 before Employment Judge E Fowell, Ms H Bharadia and Mrs S Laurence-Doig. The unanimous judgment records that Mr Drahmane was not constructively dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the claimant's complaints of harassment on grounds of race or religion, direct discrimination on grounds of race or religion, harassment on grounds of disability, and victimisation. The extracted judgment records only these dispositive outcomes and does not set out any monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant was not constructively dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Harassment | The judgment groups this with harassment on grounds of religion; extracted here as the race ground. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment groups this with harassment on grounds of race; extracted here as the religion or belief ground. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment records dismissal of direct discrimination on grounds of race or religion; extracted here as the race ground. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment records dismissal of direct discrimination on grounds of race or religion; extracted here as the religion or belief ground. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Harassment | The complaint of harassment on grounds of disability was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The complaint of victimisation was dismissed. |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.