Case 2306252/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Osuji v Practice Plus Group Health and Rehabilitation Services Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2306252/2023
- Decision date
- 24 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heath
- Venue
- London South
- Panel members
- Mr C Mardner, Ms N Beeston
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Osuji
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at London South on 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 May 2025 before Employment Judge Heath, Mr C Mardner and Ms N Beeston. The claimant, Mr F Osuji, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The written judgment records that the tribunal gave its decision orally at the hearing, so no written reasons are included in the extracted text.
The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims. It found that the claims of unfair dismissal, direct race discrimination, harassment related to race, and breach of contract were not well-founded. No remedy was awarded in the judgment record provided.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment refers to direct race discrimination. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Harassment | The judgment refers to harassment related to race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.