Case 2400559/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Hollie Adlard & others (see attached schedule) v Pure Business Group Limited (In Administration) and 3 others — 2022

Case reference: 2400559/2022
Decision date: 10 November 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Ross Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

5 named

Claimant

Hollie Adlard & others (see attached schedule)

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal dealt with the case under Rule 21. It found that the claim under section 180 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, based on the second respondent’s failure to comply with section 188, was well founded.

The tribunal ordered the second respondent to pay the claimant and the other claimants listed in the attached schedule, who were dismissed for redundancy on 2 November 2021, remuneration for a protected period of 90 days beginning on that date. The judgment does not set out a monetary total in the extracted text.

The annex states that the Recoupment Regulations apply. It also sets out the employer’s obligations to provide the Secretary of State with the relevant employee details and dates of termination for the purposes of recoupment.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Trade union	Complaint under section 180 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 for failure to comply with section 188; tribunal found it well founded and made a protective award.	Upheld	—	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.