Case 2401424/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs P Kane v St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust — 2021
- Case reference
- 2401424/2020
- Decision date
- 24 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Buzzard
- Panel members
- Mr A Clarke, Mrs A Berkeley-Hill
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs P Kane
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant withdrew her claims of indirect age discrimination and discrimination contrary to the Fixed Term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002. The Tribunal recorded those claims as dismissed on withdrawal.
The Tribunal found that the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal and discrimination contrary to the Part Time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 were well-founded and succeeded. Reasons were given orally and no written reasons are included in the supplied judgment.
The respondent was ordered to pay a basic award of £1,215 and a compensatory award of £3,003. The compensatory award comprised £350 for loss of statutory rights and £2,653 for eight weeks' loss of income, with the figures based on the parties' agreement about the claimant's weekly pay.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The judgment states that the indirect age discrimination claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Fixed-term employee regulations | The judgment states that the Fixed Term Employees Regulations claim was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The claim was found well-founded and succeeded. Compensation was awarded, but the judgment does not expressly split the monetary award between the successful unfair dismissal and Part Time Workers Regulations claims. | Upheld | — | — |
| Part-time worker regulations | The claim under the Part Time Workers Regulations was found well-founded and succeeded. The judgment does not expressly allocate a separate monetary award to this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,218
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,215
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,003
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.